Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Efficacy of Pipelle Biopsy with Dilatation and Curettage

Farahnaz Farzaneh 1 , * , Mahdi Mohammadi 2 , Abbasali Niazi 3 , Arezoo Eamaeilzadeh 4 and Soodabeh Rezaei 5
Authors Information
1 Gynecologist, Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine Research Center of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
2 Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
3 Department of Pathology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences
4 Gynacologis, Depatment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
5 General Gynecologist, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
Article information
  • Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: December 2017, 19 (12); e10892
  • Published Online: December 23, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 7, 2017
  • Revised: July 24, 2017
  • Accepted: December 12, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/zjrms.10892

To Cite: Farzaneh F, Mohammadi M, Niazi A, Eamaeilzadeh A, Rezaei S. et al. Comparison of Efficacy of Pipelle Biopsy with Dilatation and Curettage, Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2017 ;19(12):e10892. doi: 10.5812/zjrms.10892.

Abstract
Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Goldstein SR. Modern evaluation of the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(1): 168-76[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Oehler MK, Rees MC. Menorrhagia: an update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82(5): 405-22[PubMed]
  • 3. Telner DE, Jakubovicz D. Approach to diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Can Fam Physician. 2007; 53(1): 58-64[PubMed]
  • 4. Clark TJ, Gupta JK. Endometrial sampling of gynaecological pathology. Obstetr Gynaecol. 2002; 4(3): 169-74[DOI]
  • 5. Gordon SJ, Westgate J. The Incidence and Management of Failed Pipelle Sampling in a General Outpatient Clinic. Aust New Zealand J Obstetr Gynaecol. 1999; 39(1): 115-8[DOI]
  • 6. Leng X, Wang M, Zhang SL, Wang D, Cao W, Yang XH. [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013; 48(12): 891-5[PubMed]
  • 7. Fakhar S, Saeed G, Khan AH, Alam AY. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ann Saudi Med. 2008; 28(3): 188-91[PubMed]
  • 8. Liu H, Wang FL, Zhao YM, Yao YQ, Li YL. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015; 35(5): 508-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Mousavifar N, Delavari M, Talaei M. Pipelle sampling accuracy in endometrial evaluation.Babol university of medical science. 2005;
  • 10. Abdelazim IA, Aboelezz A, AbdulKareem AF. Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Turk German Gynecol Assoc. 2013; 14(1): 1
  • 11. Kazandi M, Okmen F, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Zeybek B, Zekioglu O, et al. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 32(8): 790-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Sanam M, Majid MM. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16(12): 4971-5[PubMed]
  • 13. Cooper JM, Erickson ML. Endometrial sampling techniques in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000; 27(2): 235-44[PubMed]
  • 14. Williams AR, Brechin S, Porter AJ, Warner P, Critchley HO. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling. BJOG. 2008; 115(8): 1028-36[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Yang GC, Wan LS. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45(2): 109-14
  • 16. Del Priore G, Williams R, Harbatkin CB, Wan LS, Mittal K, Yang GC. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med. 2001; 46(5): 439-43[PubMed]
  • 17. Polena V, Mergui JL, Zerat L, Sananes S. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 134(2): 233-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Wagaarachchi PT, Sirisena J. Efficiency of Pipelle device in sampling endometrium. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79(9): 793-5[PubMed]
  • 19. Elsandabesee D, Greenwood P. The performance of Pipelle endometrial sampling in a dedicated postmenopausal bleeding clinic. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 25(1): 32-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Einerth Y. Vacuum curettage by the Vabrar method. A simple procedure for endometrial diagnosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982; 61(4): 373-6[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader