Comparison of Rate and Progression of Myopia Among Carpet Weaver and Non-Weaver Members of the Weaver's Families in Birjand

AUTHORS

Mohammad Hossien Davari 1 , Hoda Gheitasi 2 , * , Esmat Davari 3

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, IR Iran

2 Department of Genetic, Translational Research, Laboratory 2 Hospital Duran I Reynolds, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

3 Department of Ophthalmology, Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, IR Iran

How to Cite: Davari M H, Gheitasi H, Davari E. Comparison of Rate and Progression of Myopia Among Carpet Weaver and Non-Weaver Members of the Weaver's Families in Birjand, Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2016 ; 18(8):e7933. doi: 10.17795/zjrms-7933.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: 18 (8); e7933
Published Online: July 31, 2016
Article Type: Short Communication
Received: April 3, 2015
Accepted: June 24, 2015
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Refractive error is a common abnormality and the most common refractive error is myopia.

Objectives: The aim of this study was To Comparison of rate of myopia among carpet weaver and non-weaver members.

Methods: In this case- control study, all members of the weavers have been refracted objectively and subjectively by only one person.

Results: The relative frequency of moderate and severe myopia in carpet weaving significantly more than non-weavers (P < 0.001). The result of Variance Analysis (ANOVA) showed that by increasing the average duration of employment and working hours daily in carpets, Myopia significantly more.

Conclusions: Sustained close distance working could have an effective role in progression and amount of myopia.

Keywords

Myopia Carpet Weaver Non- Weaver Members

Copyright © 2016, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Of all the issues surrounding myopia in children, there is probably none so contentious yet crucial as understanding the relative contributions of environment, primarily near work and heredity. Several clinical studies have documented an association between myopia and higher levels of children’s near work [1, 2].

Epidemiological studies indicated that uncorrected refractive errors are accounted to be among the important risk factors for visual impairments in the world. Although genetic, racial, and environmental risk factors were identified as some factors influential on refractive errors [3].

Numerous studies showed that near work activity causes the myopic shift [4, 5].

The art of carpet weaving in Iran is becoming more industrialized and in many parts of Iran; it is done by individuals in their homes or workshops. Important body organs such as spinal cord are involved in this job. A carpet weaver works 8 hours daily.

2. Objectives

Considering the theories on close work and its effects on ocular biometry changes, the current study is carried out in an attempt to determine the relationship between rate and progression of myopia among carpet weaver and non-weaver members of the weaver’s families.

3. Methods

In this case-control study 649 cases have been examined: 341 persons were carpets weavers and 308 non-weavers 83 (27%) male, 225 (73%) female (Table 1).

Table 1. Distribution of Refractive Errors in the Two Groups’ Carpets and Non-Carpetsa
GroupMyopiaHyperopiaNormalP Value
Carpet weaver168 (49.3)20 (5.9)153 (44.9)< 0.001
Non-carpets weaver104 (33.8)48 (15.6)156 (50.6)< 0.001
Total272 (41.9)68 (10.5)309 (47.6)< 0.001

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

Inclusion criteria, all members of the weavers families in the region have invited through written letters to the eye clinic and all of them have been refracted by retinoscope and auto refractometer (Topcon Autorefractometer, model KM 8000, Japan), Slit lamp, Ophthalmoscope and Retinoscope (HEINE Optotechnic, Germany). Objectively and subjectively by only one person.

A questionnaire was filled in for every individual (demographic information, carpet weaving background, age of starting carpet weaving) and the results of examination were recorded. In the process of examination, there was made use of exclusion criteria were: corneal scar, keratoconous, keratoglobus, diabetes, cataract, glaucoma

Refractive errors found were classified with respect to their severity into the following four groups, normal, slight, moderate and severe. 0 - 0.50 normal, 0.75 - 2.75 low, 3.00 - 6.00 medium (moderate) and 6 up high (high) are considered.

Then they obtained data was statistically analyzed using SPSS. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) refraction of -0.50 diopter (D) or less and hyperopic as an SE refraction of +0.50 D or more. Emmetropia (normal) was defined as an SE between +0.50 and -0.50 D. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Birjand University of Medical sciences. Data was analyzed by SPSS 16 software and one-way ANOVA and rang-Tukey.

4. Results

Six hundred forty nine cases have been examined: 341 persons were carpets weavers and 308 non-weavers 83 (27%) male, 225 (73%) female (Table 1).

Two hundred forty nine patients in carpets weavers (73 %) and 225 patients in non-carpets (73.1%) were female (P = 0.99).

One hundred sixty eight persons carpets (49.3 %) and 104 persons non carpets (33.8 %) were with myopia and 20 patients carpets (5.9 %) and 48 patients non carpets (15.6 %) were with hyperopia (P < 0.001) (Table 1). The relative frequency of moderate and severe myopia in carpet weaving significantly more than non-weavers (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2. Distribution of Myopia Severity in Both Groups Carpets and Non-Carpetsa
GroupLowModerateHighP Value
Carpet weaver68 (40.5)78 (46.4)22 (13.1)< 0.001
Non-carpets weaver59 (56.7)32 (30.8)13 (12.5)< 0.001
Total81 (29.8)110 (40.4)81 (29.8)< 0.001

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

The result of variance analysis (ANOVA) showed that by increasing the average duration of employment and working hours daily in carpets, Myopia significantly more, but the average age of onset carpet weaving significantly less (Table 3).

Table 3. Compare the Average Duration of Employment, Hours of Work Per Day and the Average Age of Onset in Patients Weaving Carpets According to Severity of Myopiaa
MyopiaNo.Duration occupationHoursStart ageP Value
Normal15316.48 ± 4.255.2 ± 2.7212.47 ± 3.5< 0.001
Low6819.55 ± 3.68b7.99 ± 3.21b11.06 ± 3.42b
Moderate7818.22 ± 3.76b,c8.84 ± 3.11b,c9.84 ± 2.85b,c
High2220.77 ± 4.22b,c,d9.23 ± 4.23b,c,d9.30 ± 2.67b,c,d

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

bNormal.

cLow.

dModerate.

eHigh.

The average duration of employment, hours of work per day and the average age of onset of weaving carpets in patients with hyperopia, respectively are; 25.4 ± 89.2, 26.1 ± 00.4, 52.3 ± 21.12. On the basis of data, the result was that the rate and progression of myopia was twice more among weaver member family in respect to non-weaver family members. According to these results we can say that carpentry (working near the eye) can be a factor involved in creating or exacerbating myopia

5. Discussion

Our finding indicates that myopia among members of a family involved in carpet weaving is more common compared to those members not involved in carpet weaving. Genetic factors are generally the same in both groups. In this study, both heredity and near work were significantly associated with myopia, with heredity being the more important factor. This fact light over such an environmental factor as close work.

The association of close work with the refractive status especially myopia was a hypothetical consideration for a time in the past. In 1995 Chen studied 110 individuals working with diamond (Small, expensive pieces of stones) and reached the conclusion that myopia was more common among those who involved in close work [6].

Mutti et al. [7] in study, Parental Myopia, Near Work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error: They also found no evidence to support the theory that heredity is important only because parents with myopia have children who do more near work. Children of parents without myopia did as much near work as children of parents with myopia. This is consistent with previous studies that report on both near work and parental history of refractive error. Bear et al. [8] found little change in correlations between the refractive errors of family members after adjustment for the current level of near work, suggesting a strong genetic component independent of near work. Although Wong et al. [9] reported significant odds ratios for both hours per day of reading and familial tendency toward myopia; they did not assess the effect of each variable on the other by comparing univariate and multivariate odds ratios. In a sample of Singaporean conscripts with a highly myopic average refractive error of -6.1 D, Saw et al. [10] found that parental myopia was significantly related to myopia, but neither past nor current near work was a confounding variable, because near work was not associated with myopia. Parental myopia became no significant when adjusted not for near work, but for educational level and placement in a pour study highlights the role of environmental factors. In carpet weaving the eyes have to focus on close objects like the carpet frame. On the other hand, the worker cannot see distant objects because the carpet frame and the surroundings don't provide such an opportunity during working. Most carpet weavers under study work early in the morning until late in the afternoon and in between they have a short break for their lunch.

Therefore carpet weaving with the about mentioned circumstances is an example of close continuous ophthalmic work that first the theory of over accommodation.

It increases the severity of acquired myopia through hypertrophy of cilia muscles. In general close work and continuous accommodation as in carpet weaving may increase the severity of myopia [11].

Generally, comparison of this finding with the results of the previous studies which have been accomplished in Iran shows that the occurrence of myopia is high in the carpet weaving population. In a study performed based on cycloplegic and non cycloplegic refractions in Tehran, Iran, the incidence of myopia was 17.20% and 21.80% respectively [12]. Also, in a report concerning the elderly population in Mashhad, the incidence of myopia has been shown to be 27.20%. Investigation of these studies shows that the occurrence of myopia is high in carpet weaver’s population. Comparing this result with the incidence of myopia in the healthy population of other studies, we see that the prevalence of myopia in the carpet weavers is more than that in many of other studies [11].

We find that myopia among members of a family involved in carpet weaving is more common (twice) compared to those members not involved in carpet weaving.

The previous studies reported that near work is the reason for myopia progressions. Refractive errors have previously been investigated in some occupations such as computer, operators, typists, and microscopes that have near work activities. In addition to near work, other factors such as environmental and genetic factors play a role in progression of myopia [13].

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Zylbermann R, Landau D, Berson D. The influence of study habits on myopia in Jewish teenagers. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993; 30(5) : 319 -22 [PubMed]
  • 2. Zadnik K, Satariano WA, Mutti DO, Sholtz RI, Adams AJ. The effect of parental history of myopia on children's eye size. JAMA. 1994; 271(17) : 1323 -7 [PubMed]
  • 3. Warrier S, Wu HM, Newland HS, Muecke J, Selva D, Aung T, et al. Ocular biometry and determinants of refractive error in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92(12) : 1591 -4 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(1) : 73 -80 [PubMed]
  • 5. McBrien NA, Adams DW. A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Refractive and biometric findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38(2) : 321 -33 [PubMed]
  • 6. Chen CJ, Cohen BH, Diamond EL. Genetic and environmental effects on the development of myopia in Chinese twin children. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1985; 6(1-2) : 353 -9 [PubMed]
  • 7. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, Jones LA, Zadnik K. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(12) : 3633 -40 [PubMed]
  • 8. Bear JC, Richler A, Burke G. Nearwork and familial resemblances in ocular refraction: a population study in Newfoundland. Clin Genet. 1981; 19(6) : 462 -72 [PubMed]
  • 9. Wong L, Coggon D, Cruddas M, Hwang CH. Education, reading, and familial tendency as risk factors for myopia in Hong Kong fishermen. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993; 47(1) : 50 -3 [PubMed]
  • 10. Saw SM, Wu HM, Seet B, Wong TY, Yap E, Chia KS, et al. Academic achievement, close up work parameters, and myopia in Singapore military conscripts. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(7) : 855 -60 [PubMed]
  • 11. Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, Wu HM, Chan WY, Chia KS, et al. Nearwork in early-onset myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(2) : 332 -9 [PubMed]
  • 12. Yekta AA, Fotouhi A, Khabazkhoob M, Hashemi H, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. The prevalence of refractive errors and its determinants in the elderly population of Mashhad, Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009; 16(3) : 198 -203 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Jimenez JR, Bermudez J, Rubino M, Gomez L, Anera RG. Prevalence of myopia in an adult population of two different ethnic groups in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004; 48(2) : 163 -5 [DOI][PubMed]
  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: